Fw PHY Midge - nobler 1355-2.eml

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_002C_01BF973B.B8D69B00
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


----- Original Message -----=20
From: nobler=20
To: =20
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2000 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: PHY Midge


Looking at the other taper given I took them a bit differently. My butt =
section is measured from the end of the female down the butt section. =
This means the first 5" dimension is taken 5" from the end of the female =
ferrule, as are all the others for this section. Still, it seems very =
close to the other rod listed.

My thinking was to get as close as possible to the dimensions where the =
ferrules are mounted.

GMA
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Steven Weiss=20
  To: Rodmakers=20
  Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 12:32 AM
  Subject: PHY Midge


  Has anyone noticed that the tapers in the Rodmakers taper file and the =
one in Howell's book are quite different from each other? I'd like to =
feel a little more confident about which numbers to use. I have read =
that Paul Young's rods had a lot of variance among the same models. Does =
anyone have a PHY midge taper that is different , or that confirms =
either one of the ones I mentioned?
  Steve

------=_NextPart_000_002C_01BF973B.B8D69B00
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable